Darwin vs. the eye
by Tom Wagner
Charles Darwin himself realized that it seemed incredible that evolutionary processes
had to explain human vision. He said:
‘To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting
the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and
for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed
by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.’1
Yet, later on in the same chapter of his book, he explained how he believed it evolved
anyway and that the ‘absurdity’ was illusory. Had Darwin had the knowledge
about the eye and its associated systems that man has today (which is a great deal
more than what it was in his time), he may have given up his naturalistic theory
on the origin of living things.
One fascinating discovery in the study of modern ophthalmology (eye science) is
that, aside from what Darwin was able to observe, there are three almost imperceptibly
tiny eye movements. These three, referred to as ‘tremors, drifts and saccades’,
are caused by minute contractions in the six muscles attached to the outside of
each of your eyes. Every fraction of a second they very slightly shift the position
of your eyeball, automatically, without conscious effort on your part, making sight
as you know it possible.
Tremors — the tiniest and probably the most intriguing of these movements,
continuously and rapidly wobble your eyeball about its center in a circular fashion.
They cause the cornea and retina (front and back) of your eyes to move in circles
with incredibly minute diameters of approximately 1/1000 (.001) of a millimeter,
or .00004 inch.
This size is about 70 times smaller than the thickness of a piece of paper. Carefully
look at a piece of paper, edge on, then try to imagine 70 circles of the same diameter
(OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO) touching and placed in a row straight across
the thickness of the paper. If you can do that, you will have a feel for the minuscule
nature of the tremors along with some appreciation for the Creator who has demonstrated
His capacity for designing such a thing.
Amazing Tremors
An even more amazing characteristic of tremors is that the seemingly tireless muscles
that produce them wobble your eye 30 to 70 times each second. If sound were involved,
that would be fast enough to produce a low-pitched hum. Amazingly, on average, each
of your eyes completes one million of these tiny circular motions in 5 1/2 hours.
The number of tremors taking place in a lifetime is astronomical.
Even though tremors are not large enough to be visible without great magnification,
you could not see properly without them.
For example, consider what would happen if these and all other eye movements stopped
while you were staring at someone’s face. The light-sensing cells in your
retina would quickly ‘stabilize’, and cease to send updated information
to your brain, causing the image you perceive to fade into a uniform gray within
seconds. If the person you were staring at smiled, their mouth, and only their mouth,
would momentarily reappear out of a visual field of nothingness!
(This has been done in the laboratory,2 and was said to have looked like
the smile of the Cheshire cat in Alice in Wonderland.)
The reappearance of only part of the face would happen because only the mouth moved,
causing a momentary change in that part of the picture which the retina was seeing
at the time.
Thus, continued change in the light projected on each retinal cell in your eyes
is crucial for constant vision. Hence the need for tremors that God has made to
supply the retina with a slightly shifting picture many times each second. Without
the tremors, which are probably the most critical muscular phenomenon for normal
vision, you would have to be constantly looking about or continuously altering the
light on a subject to see anything for longer than a few seconds at a time.
During drift movements, the eye drifts relatively slowly and smoothly off the target
where you are looking until it reaches an angle equal to about 12 times the size
of a tremor. At this time the eye automatically jerks, via a ‘saccade’,
back to its original position. Saccades, which happen up to several times a second,
are very quick, jerk-type movements that are used to correct for whatever drifts
are occurring.
Eyes on the Move
An interesting way to observe the effect that drifts, along with associated saccades,
have on your visual system is to carefully study the type of graphic shown here.
This experiment will show you that your eyes are indeed moving all the time, even
when you think that they are not.
A fascinating discovery since Darwin’s time is three broad classes of almost
imperceptible eye movements—drifts, tremors and saccades. To demonstrate that
your eyes are always on the move, even when you think they are not, study the graphic
above. An ‘afterimage’ is superimposed on the image you see, giving
a twinkling effect that seems to be moving. Try keeping your eye steady—the
twinkling effect continues.
Look intently at the center of the graphic on the right. You should see a slight
‘shimmering, psychedelic effect’ that seems to jump about no matter
how hard you work at holding your eyes still. This phenomenon can be enhanced if,
while you stare at the figure, you stand at arm’s length, then twist or turn
your body. Each time a random drift or small saccade takes place, the new picture
your retina sees appears to interplay or interfere with a lingering ‘after
image’ of what was seen a fraction of a second earlier. That is what causes
the appearance of a shifting motion within the graphic. In this experiment, the
tremors are too small and too fast to have a noticeable effect.
Large saccades are employed in scanning motions like reading. As you read this article,
you may think your vision is smoothly scanning, letter by letter, or word by word,
but this is not so. Instead, the precise alignment of your two eyes is synchronously
hopping along, via those ‘jerk-back’ saccades, following each line.
During the moment a saccade is occurring, your vision is blurred, so between the
hops are momentary stops which give the eye-brain system time to decipher the printed
letters into meaningful phrases.
Think of how challenging it would be for a human to create the genetic code needed
to produce the fine-tuned nervous system that makes precise, coordinated muscular
movements (like tremors, drifts and saccades) possible. When Darwin made his assumptions
about the origin of organs, he had nothing like the knowledge we have today. Had
he been aware of the need for the tiny precision humming. Hopping eyeball motions
that are going on all the time while we are awake, he may have abandoned his theory
of evolution as foolish and impracticable speculation.
There is indeed abundant evidence of the Creator’s handiwork in all we see
around us, and what we see with.
References
- Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species, J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd, London,
1971, p. 167.
- David S. Falk, Dieter R. Brill and David G. Stork, Seeing The Light: Optics
in Nature, Photography, ColourVision, and Holography, Harper & Row Publishers
Inc., New York, 1986, pp. 192–193; Arthur S. Freese, The Miracle of Vision,
Harper & Row Publishers Inc., New York, 1977, pp. 46–49; Tom N. Cornsweet,
Visual Perception, Academic Press, New York, 1970, pp. 399–404.
|